All three will hold your deals. What separates them is what they assume you will buy next.
Choosing a CRM feels like choosing a database and turns out to be choosing a direction. One of these expects to become your marketing platform too, one expects you to keep marketing somewhere else, and one expects your team to spend the day on the phone. Pick against that grain and you will spend a year working around the product.
The seat price is the least interesting number here. What matters is the step you take when the free tier runs out or a second team wants in, because that step is rarely small and it is very hard to reverse once years of history live in the system.
The one that starts genuinely free — two users and a thousand marketing contacts with no time limit — and is designed so you keep adding hubs. That is its strength and its risk: the shared contact database is worth real money if you use more than one hub, and poor value if you only ever wanted a pipeline.
Skip it if you need one job done well and cheaply, because a dedicated tool will almost always beat the equivalent HubSpot hub on price; or your contact list is growing fast and your budget is not, since contacts are the meter that moves without you touching anything
Visit HubSpot →Read our full HubSpot review →The straightforward pipeline tool. It assumes your marketing lives somewhere else and does not try to win that argument, which makes it the easy answer for a team that wants deals visible on day one. If you want automation and outbound in the same product, this is not it.
Skip it if you want marketing automation in the same tool (HubSpot) or need built-in outbound prospecting
Visit Pipedrive →Read our full Pipedrive review →Built around the phone: calling, SMS and CRM in one inbox, priced per seat with a meaningful annual discount. Worth the premium if your team actually dials; if your sales are email-led or self-serve you are paying for a telephony stack you will not touch.
Skip it if your sales are mostly email or self-serve — a cheaper CRM without built-in calling covers you
Visit Close →Read our full Close review →| Tool | What it meters | Pricing, as we read it |
|---|---|---|
| HubSpot | free tier, then per seat and per contact | Free is $0 for up to 2 users and 1,000 marketing contacts, with no time limit. read 2026-08-18 |
| Pipedrive | per seat, four plans | (read 2026-08-26 on pipedrive.com/pricing over a US connection; the monthly column below is our 2026-08-16 reading from the EU) Four seat-based plans. read 2026-08-26 |
| Close | per seat, calling included | Per-seat: Solo $19, Essentials $49, Growth $109 and Scale $149 per user/mo, or $9, $35, $99 and $139 billed annually. read 2026-08-14 |
A free CRM tier is where your company history starts accumulating, and that history is what makes migrating painful later. Before you adopt one on the grounds that it costs nothing, look at the plan above it and ask whether you would be happy paying that in a year — because by then moving will cost more than the difference.
The related trap is contact-based pricing. Seats grow slowly and predictably; contact counts grow every time marketing does its job. If the meter is contacts, model it against your list in eighteen months, not today.
Probably yes, but not an expensive one. The value at that size is having one place where the next step on each deal is written down; the automation and reporting that justify higher tiers only pay off with more people and more deals.
You can, and whether you should depends on whether you will use it. A combined platform is good value when two teams share the contact database and poor value when one team uses a fifth of the product.
The data moves; the workflows, integrations and habits do not. Assume a switch costs weeks of attention rather than an export and an import, and let that push you to think one step ahead now.
Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you sign up we may earn a commission, at no cost to you, and it never changes what we write. Every figure above was read on the vendor’s own page on the date shown.